Singapour est-elle un pay democratique?

Est-elle liberti parole a Singapour?  Vous recevez un FORMA, un ordre de direction, chaque fois tu ecrier quelque chose ce ne gouvernement rejouit pas.

Le premier ministre et son ministres empocher l'argent de million de personnes alor que les gens survivent a peine avec a cout de la vie tres eleve. Mai il y en un suffisemment Singapourians  credules les voter a chaque election generale qui les vote. Qu'en pensez-vous est la raison?

Nous en a vous de  tres patriotes heros nationale qui prend le governement  encharge a cause de leur  charactere antidemocratique iniquite mais ils ont le peau si epaisse qu'il n'y a pas la recours.

Quels sont les perspective politique?   Parti Ouvrier (Workers' Party) est un lessivage avec Pritam Singh en tete. Progrss Singapore Party (PSP) sous la direction de Dr. Tan Cheng Bock peut fournir un salut s'il pourvait en avoir assez candidates  appropries du calibre de Leong Mun Wai ils pourraient faire une grande preche sur la suprematie de PAP governement meme sine pourrai peut-etre pas pour les deloge.

Dieu Singapour benisse.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

The invincibility of Singapore Recalcitrant

 Singapore Recalcitrant provides a modest public service to counter the PAP propaganda from hoodwinking the public. God does not countenance its curtailment. The avaricious PM Lawrence Wong emerged as a promising prime minister but soon evolved into a self-serving premier. He started off very impressively with inspiring orations with promises to improve the people's life but constant repetition almost on the same themes has however numbed the people's mind.but the show must go on. He made a slew of promises which may or may not  be fulfilled but one very glaring character flaw is his denial to reduce the obscene astronomical ministerial salaries turning his back to the torrential public demands. He unabashedly portrayed himself as a people's prime minister. Do you accept or maybe see through him as some kind of an imposter. He now shows that he really comes from the same stock as Lee Hsien Loong who enriches himself with millions of people's money. PM Lawrence Wong cann...
Read more

A penny for your thought

 My dear high and mighty PM Lawrence Wong. A penny for your thought. May I have the honour to ask you a simple question that is boggling the mind of the Singapore public? Would you be so kind as to give us a clear explanarion why is it you and your avaricious ministers need such obscene astronomical salaries to perform so-called golden public service to the people of Singapore. What is the criterior that you need more than our times the salary of the American President to serve Singapore? Is it that you insanely insists that Singapore is four times more important and larger than America and volume of service more complex and higher US? Are you sure you are not talking from a mental asylum?  The money that you and your ministers are amssing from the people is their blood and sweat money which should go for the enhancement of their welfare and livelihood facing core inflation and high cost of living while you and your ministers are living in luxury at their expense. Is this what...
Read more

A birdeyes-view of the general election 2025

 The general election 2025 will take place by end of November 2025. So it piques the political parties to start a universal campaigne to entice the loyalties of the electors to vote for them in the GE. Quite naturally the PAP with its resources lost no time in the electioneering in pre-empting the opposition by sending their potential candidates to visit voters to endear themselves with them to vote for the PAP.  They are definitely in an advantage over the opposition in the bras de fer for votes and would likely romp home  quite easily. Needless to say this is going to be a zugzwang to the opposition and whatever they think it will definitely affect their chances of deminishing the votes of PAP.  PM Lawrence Wong expressed fear that the opposition may dislodge the PAP in the GE but he really said it with the tongue -in-cheek and within him he was never so sure of retaining power. This was his hypocrity in display. It was definitely a scare tactic to frighten the vot...
Read more