Singapore Recalcitrant

 你们認为新加坡是民主统治？可能有一点谜惑。 现在统治新加坡是一群行动党财阀。他们不只是百万富翁 而 是千万富豪。他们的钱是从人民的血汗钱。本来政治家是大公无私的为人民服务。但这群行动党政客可以说是为人民服务或是假冒为人民服务而把人民的血汗钱饱入私囊。试问黄循财总理解释这个令人废解的谜。新加坡是个小国 而你拿的薪金是四次高于美国总统的薪金。是给人民甚么黄金服务 这群行动党财阀所拿的是人民的血汗钱。黄循财是那一种总理连一个基本的原则都不理会。如狼吞虎咽的把人民的血汗钱饱入私囊。假冒为給人民黄金服务。天下还有没有这样抹杀良心的人民代表？ 请问黄循财总理你们拿这么多人民的钱不能带去坟墓要作何用途？难道用在人民福利？如果将人民的血汗钱当遗产留给后代是天不可恕的罪行。 我们邻居崇高的马来西亚首相案华能无薪为人民服务。难道薪加坡总理黄循财不能看齐？薪加坡更富有而无薪服务不是一个问题。 主要是黄循财的人格比得上案华的人格。 最低限度黄循财的首要任务是把极高昂的总理和部长薪金减到国外领袖的薪金。 犹其是美国总统的薪金。我们拭目以待。

 I was having a pleasurable mental indulgnce in an imagined utopia when it suddenly darned on me that it would be edifying to the intoxicated public if I delineate a configaration of Singapore politics. Is Singapore a democracy and a eqalitarian society? We are governed by a bunch of PAP plutocrats who are not only miliionaires  but multii-millionaires who derive their wealth from people's money. Genuine politicians are humanistic persons who serve the people without self-interest. Do you think the avaricious PM Lawrence Wong and his bunch of plutocrats fit this description? There are people who face core inflation and high cost of living in their livelihood and Lawrence Wong and his buddies live in luxury at people's expense. Is this an egalitarian society? He uses people's money to provide succour ostensibly to relieve the people's burden in facing hardship but does he really beleieve that this will solve their hardship for a long-term or merely ephemeral and return t...

 PM Lawrence Wong's inspiratory speech at the swearing-in ceremony could be described as earth-shattering as it was intended to capture the whimsicle imagination of the public that he and his government was there to help them overcome a life-and-death struggle in their liveilihood..It's intersting that he mentioned the government was prepared to welcome criticsm as it enhances the government's thinking. Is he really serious or merely hypocritical true to his character?  He can show his intirnsic sincerity by first allowing the Straits Times to disseminate opposition voices.Straits Times is heavily funded by the government and is openly known by the public as a PAP propaganda organ. People will believe your genuineness if you do that. Next is your obscene astronomical ministerial salaries which you dis not mention. Do you honestly believe that  This is a fair?? cost to the public coffers? What kind of golden service you are providing that requires entitles you to receive f...

 The dust has settled and the PAP has achieved a strong mandate to govern for the next five years. It will be interesting to reminisce the punitory battle of mind for the heart and mind of the electorate. The v enal and hypocritical Lawrence Wong displayed his ordinary oratorical skill in his sermon to mesmerize the voters. Pritam Singh was superb in his forceful eloquent assertiveness which badly rattled the hysterical Lawrence Wong into a heart-rending fear of losing three or four minister which fortunately did not happen. By Pritam Singh's performance the Worker's Party should have captured more than ten seats but apparently fate was not on its side. Pritam Singh was indeed the star of the husting and he would receive the respect of Lawrence Wong in or out of Parliament. By all accounts Gan Kim Yong should have been dislodged by WP Prapreet Singh but fate was on his side and Prapreet Singh was slightly over-hyped. Progress Singapore Party was a great disappointment. Tan Chen...